A Ministry of Education has posted the full report (5 Mb) on the Comprehensive Assessment of Diagnosis 2009 4 th Primary. At first glance the document I have seen things that I liked and things that do not. On the one hand, the report closely follows the methodology of presentation of PISA, which is both good and bad: the good is the technical rigor (very much in doubt after last Report on Primary Education Assessment ) and a very clear presentation of data, but on the other hand deepens very little, which is logical in PISA (a report of many countries and where microdata are available to all) but not in a national report. I think you can get much more out.
Best of the report is finally published results by region. As tomorrow will in all the newspapers (although the World forward), I will not insist further on the subject. But, for you do not know, until now the politicians, as we are both so much for us and ensure we were not allowed to know those results by regions, lest they frighten us. As far as I know, the ban continues for microdata assessments Evaluation Institute. Of course, to protect the hard truth, not to avoid a kick to give the inept mismanaged educational system.
worst, a structure that re-emphasizes the usual suspects (socioeconomic, immigration) and not actual school factors. Back to that.
supine for stupidity, so the homogeneous system Eva Almunia and the Ministry. No where to get it: "Among the results, which must have a comprehensive reading to appreciate a real sense of the situation, the study emphasizes the homogeneity of the educational system throughout the country, with few differences between regions. ". So, 8% of students in Navarra, La Rioja, Castilla y León and Asturias are below Level 2 ("suspended", so to speak), but in the Balearics or the Canary Islands (let Ceuta and Melilla) make it the 25 and 24% respectively. That, with the same education system, equally prepared teachers, etc. Four times more likely to get bad results because they live in one place or another. How many repeat what the Minister says and not what the data say? How many will put both on the same page?
now, so I'm even starting to laugh (the goat, which pulls p'al monte), is the question on page 102. As the answer is correct or not and Cánovas Sagasta or Maura, but even Azaña were Presidents of the Council of Ministers in a democratic manner. C2C. If we keep out there, it was in Greece birthplace of democracy, of course, but in New Zealand . Which country and what the Ministry of Heducación.
0 comments:
Post a Comment